<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Joomla database schema smells</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/2010/07/12/the-joomla-database-schema-smells/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/2010/07/12/the-joomla-database-schema-smells/</link>
	<description>My personal piece of cyberspace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:21:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: O modelo de dados do Joomla &#124; SWX Softwares - Desenvolvimento e Design Web</title>
		<link>http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/2010/07/12/the-joomla-database-schema-smells/#comment-19921</link>
		<dc:creator>O modelo de dados do Joomla &#124; SWX Softwares - Desenvolvimento e Design Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/?p=117#comment-19921</guid>
		<description>[...] Existem várias características e pontos do modelo do Joomla que podem ser analisados. O próprio Torkil Johnsen já apresentou diversos aspectos do modelo que ele crê que podem ser melhorados no artigo chamado The Joomla database schema smells. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Existem várias características e pontos do modelo do Joomla que podem ser analisados. O próprio Torkil Johnsen já apresentou diversos aspectos do modelo que ele crê que podem ser melhorados no artigo chamado The Joomla database schema smells. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torkil Johnsen</title>
		<link>http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/2010/07/12/the-joomla-database-schema-smells/#comment-19755</link>
		<dc:creator>Torkil Johnsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/?p=117#comment-19755</guid>
		<description>Joomla 1.0-1.5 uses section-category-content. Meaning that sections hold categories which in turn hold content articles.

For Joomla 1.6, there are now just categories (multi-levelled too) and content articles, so that&#039;s one of the new high-profile features. Still years behind other systems, even other Joomla extensions, and one article can still belong to only one category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joomla 1.0-1.5 uses section-category-content. Meaning that sections hold categories which in turn hold content articles.</p>
<p>For Joomla 1.6, there are now just categories (multi-levelled too) and content articles, so that&#8217;s one of the new high-profile features. Still years behind other systems, even other Joomla extensions, and one article can still belong to only one category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosbif56</title>
		<link>http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/2010/07/12/the-joomla-database-schema-smells/#comment-19222</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosbif56</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/?p=117#comment-19222</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t agree more - just one thing (I new to Joomla, but this design makes my hair stand on end...) - I got the impression from the doc that there was a definite hierarchical progression from category to section to content. This sin&#039;t reflected in the DB. Content links directly to Category. Is this a design consideration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t agree more &#8211; just one thing (I new to Joomla, but this design makes my hair stand on end&#8230;) &#8211; I got the impression from the doc that there was a definite hierarchical progression from category to section to content. This sin&#8217;t reflected in the DB. Content links directly to Category. Is this a design consideration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torkil Johnsen</title>
		<link>http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/2010/07/12/the-joomla-database-schema-smells/#comment-18840</link>
		<dc:creator>Torkil Johnsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/?p=117#comment-18840</guid>
		<description>okay, I changed the posting date to July 12th instead of July 11th, hope that helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay, I changed the posting date to July 12th instead of July 11th, hope that helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySQL Workbench</title>
		<link>http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/2010/07/12/the-joomla-database-schema-smells/#comment-18839</link>
		<dc:creator>MySQL Workbench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/?p=117#comment-18839</guid>
		<description>Hi Torkil,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You did everything fine.  But, only your blogs published *after* the date your blog was aggregated get picked up.  The &quot;smells&quot; blog, was published *before*, so it was not pulled in.  That is why, I was asking you to republish it (new &quot;posted date&quot; will get it aggregated).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- MySQL Workbench</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Torkil,</p>
<p>You did everything fine.  But, only your blogs published *after* the date your blog was aggregated get picked up.  The &#8220;smells&#8221; blog, was published *before*, so it was not pulled in.  That is why, I was asking you to republish it (new &#8220;posted date&#8221; will get it aggregated).</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>- MySQL Workbench</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torkil Johnsen</title>
		<link>http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/2010/07/12/the-joomla-database-schema-smells/#comment-18838</link>
		<dc:creator>Torkil Johnsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/?p=117#comment-18838</guid>
		<description>A nice link concerning reverse engineering MyISAM schemas:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wb.mysql.com/?p=271&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://wb.mysql.com/?p=271&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s a plugin that will auto-create relationships, even though these do not exist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Downside to this is that it will only work with databases that have a clear naming convention for their databases, so Joomla is a no-go, but Nooku developers could find this useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice link concerning reverse engineering MyISAM schemas:<br /><a href="http://wb.mysql.com/?p=271" rel="nofollow">http://wb.mysql.com/?p=271</a></p>
<p>It&#39;s a plugin that will auto-create relationships, even though these do not exist.</p>
<p>Downside to this is that it will only work with databases that have a clear naming convention for their databases, so Joomla is a no-go, but Nooku developers could find this useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torkil Johnsen</title>
		<link>http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/2010/07/12/the-joomla-database-schema-smells/#comment-18836</link>
		<dc:creator>Torkil Johnsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/?p=117#comment-18836</guid>
		<description>Hm. Did I provide the wrong RSS URL?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The correct URL is supposed to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/category/databases/feed/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/category/databases...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The article is published there, as far as I can tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. Did I provide the wrong RSS URL?</p>
<p>The correct URL is supposed to be <a href="http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/category/databases/feed/" rel="nofollow">http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/category/databases&#8230;</a></p>
<p>The article is published there, as far as I can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySQL Workbench</title>
		<link>http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/2010/07/12/the-joomla-database-schema-smells/#comment-18834</link>
		<dc:creator>MySQL Workbench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/?p=117#comment-18834</guid>
		<description>Hi Torkil,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your blog is now aggregated and showing up on PlanetMySQL.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, this post &quot;The Joomla database schema smells&quot; was previously published (before aggregation).  Can you republish it (so it gets aggregated)?  I think it will be of big interest in the MySQL community too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- MySQL Workbench</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Torkil,</p>
<p>Your blog is now aggregated and showing up on PlanetMySQL.</p>
<p>But, this post &#8220;The Joomla database schema smells&#8221; was previously published (before aggregation).  Can you republish it (so it gets aggregated)?  I think it will be of big interest in the MySQL community too.</p>
<p>- MySQL Workbench</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySQL Workbench</title>
		<link>http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/2010/07/12/the-joomla-database-schema-smells/#comment-18835</link>
		<dc:creator>MySQL Workbench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/?p=117#comment-18835</guid>
		<description>Hi Hannes,&lt;br&gt;Any possibility to replace MyISAM tables with InnoDB?  So much benefit just from that simple change.  We have made InnoDB default in MySQL  (MyISAM used to be default).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- MySQL Workbench</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hannes,<br />Any possibility to replace MyISAM tables with InnoDB?  So much benefit just from that simple change.  We have made InnoDB default in MySQL  (MyISAM used to be default).</p>
<p>- MySQL Workbench</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nooku Framework, why should you care ? &#171; Nooku Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/2010/07/12/the-joomla-database-schema-smells/#comment-18830</link>
		<dc:creator>Nooku Framework, why should you care ? &#171; Nooku Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torkiljohnsen.com/?p=117#comment-18830</guid>
		<description>[...] me better. Nooku reuses solutions to common problems (design patterns) to a greater extent, and unlike Joomla it forces me to adhere to conventions and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] me better. Nooku reuses solutions to common problems (design patterns) to a greater extent, and unlike Joomla it forces me to adhere to conventions and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.301 seconds -->

